MX Linux comes with the XFCE desktop environment as standard, although the developers have tweaked things a little, with a customizable taskbar on the left side.XFCE is famed for being lightweigh,t so it���s a good choice by the developers, as it means you���re not going to be struggling on older systems. I'm just about ready to install one of these distros onto my SSD for the long-term as my daily driver and ��� When comparing Manjaro Linux vs MX-Linux, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people.In the question���What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?���Manjaro Linux is ranked 9th while MX-Linux is ranked 14th. This place is dedicated to finding exactly which GNU/Linux distribution, also known as a distro, is right for you. When comparing Ubuntu vs MX-Linux, the Slant community recommends MX-Linux for most people.In the question���What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?���MX-Linux is ranked 16th while Ubuntu is ranked 26th. That said, if you decide on Ubuntu (Xubuntu), you will be best served with the LTS version for stability. MX tools are great and their build in MX manual is the best manual I seen for a Linux distro. The same goes for MX Linux. MX Linux is a cooperative venture between the former MEPIS Linux and antiX communities. I don't think OP can go wrong either way. Most of all, just have fun experimenting and learning! Mint maybe? Overall, I think you would benefit from not overthinking your choice too much and going with what you enjoy and what makes sense to you. While you may know what you want in terms of optimal performance and stability, the options for the OS can be confusing. Gaining popularity in the Linux community. As you mentioned in the OP, you're not afraid to switch if need be. XFCE4 is a mature desktop environment and user friendly. Stability is the prime moto of Debian stable version. MX is using Xfce as it's default Desktop Environment. Is that like Wine? Other XFCE distros? I've found that the fresh 6-month releases have the potential to be buggy upon release. I would go with Mx-Linux personally. Right on, I think I will stick with MX Linux for a while. I'm just about ready to install one of these distros onto my SSD for the long-term as my daily driver and just wanted to hear any advice before doing so. Both distributions benefit from being Ubuntu and reap all the third party support, loads of packages, and extensive community support. The system is based on the belief that every computer user should have the freedom to download, run, copy, distribute, study, share and improve their software without paying licensing fees, should be able to use their software in whichever language they choose, and should be able to use all software regardless of d��� Having used MX Linux for a few months, I can say with confidence that it's very Ubuntu-like in its ease of use. It seems (after reading a bit on the website), that it builds in tools from the antiX and MEPIS distributions, which appear to be geared more towards power users. Xubuntu Vs Lubuntu Most of these two distros are put in the same brackets because there is a lot of commonness between them. If you use VirtualBox to run Linux, you may notice that performance isn���t great, and are looking for ways to improve it. My computer is pretty powerful, performance isn't an issue, I do game semi-frequently and plan on switching between Windows and Linux depending on which games I want to play, Not afraid to switch distros down the road. But you likely won't need to know these details for your use case. But at this stage in the deployment of UEFI, many offerings differ in their implementation of the UEFI spec. What exactly is DXVK? Ubuntu and MX-Linux are both derivatives of Debian Linux. I do like the idea of Ubuntu based distros having lots of plug and play capability. However, if you want to run DXVK for windows games on linux, you will probably have to go Ubuntu to get a the newer NVIDIA drivers from some sort of distro provided repo (assuming you use NVIDIA). If your finding that MX is the one that is best for you, run with it. The Nvidia driver installer just as good as Ubuntu's, and Steam worked right out of the box for me. Windows vs Linux - In-depth Blender Benchmark Comparison - ��� UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) is the replacement for legacy BIOS. Steam support may be a bit trickier since it relies on Ubuntu-specific packages. Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu Linux Performance On A $199 AMD Ryzen ��� You may not have a need or even know why some features are provided, such as a different init system, how they fork Debian stable, etc. Are there any other XFCE distros I should look into? MX-18 | And the best distro of 2019 is ��� A repeat performance! The difference however, is that if Ubuntu disappeared tomorrow, MX Linux would be largely unaffected while Linux Mint might have to retool to get away from their Ubuntu core. As a Linux noob, I've found that the Ubuntu distros and MX Linux 17.1 have been the easiest to learn and use, with MX Linux being my favorite of all the distros. Package management is very harmonious in Ubuntu.Ubuntu is a 100 percent dependable if you do a fresh install and continue to use it as it is. They are always recommended when one is looking for a lightweight Linux desktop OS.When you have a really old PC and you are looking for a replacement for something like Windows XP to bring the life back to it, or even if you want to devote all of your ���new��� ��� Kubuntu vs Ubuntu vs Xubuntu: An Alternative OS Comparison | ��� I think Mx-Linux i more responsive and more reliable. No problems at all. Windows 10 WSL vs. VirtualBox Ubuntu Performance On An Intel ��� Debian doesn't even have a release schedule. The most important reason people chose Manjaro Linux is: The packages are highly stable and the MX system is highly dependable.Ubuntu is a stability-focused distro too. Overall I'd say Ubuntu MATE or Linux Mint is probably better/easier for an absolute beginner, but MX is one of the most user-friendly straight Debian based distros I've yet used (Netrunner and Neptune Linux being runners up, but those are KDE based). This comparison desktop comparison of Ubuntu vs Arch Linux is hard since both distros can achieve the same look and feel. This is the main reason why professionals trust Debian with their servers. Beginning with the introduction of Microsoft���s Windows 8, most modern PCs now ship with UEFI firmware. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the FindMeADistro community. Now, GNOME is a unique experience. MX Linux MX Linux is relatively new, but its population has exploded recently, and it's definitely worth a look. Welcome to Linux. In 2005, Intel���s initial specification for EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) was contributed to the UEFI Forum which manages and licenses the spec going forward. Linux Board Support Packages (BSPs) for NXP Silicon are tested and certified ensuring a fully operational tool chain, kernel and board specific modules that are ready to use together within a fixed configuration for i.MX hardware development tools. Don't forget to flair/tag your posts! Whether you have an older system with 256 MB of RAM, or a top of the line battle station, this subreddit is the best spot to get sound advice from the GNU/Linux community. Personally, I trust Ubuntu so much that I use it as my daily driver and I do all my development work on it. These BSPs provide the foundation you need to begin your project quickly. Awesome, thank you for the input. This comparison reviews two popular operating systems for Linux - CentOS vs Ubuntu. But a prodigal son has been on the rise. Ubuntu���s original philosophy was to create an easy-to-use Linux desktop with reliable new releases every six months. MX Linux, a desktop-oriented Linux distribution based on Debian's "stable" branch, is a cooperative venture between the antiX and former MEPIS Linux communities. I hope this helped. The struggle in me wonders if I should keep using MX Linux as its been my favorite, or go with Xubuntu because of the vast amount of support through the Ubuntu userbase and software, making it an easier journey as a noob. Top 10 Best Linux Distro 2020 a Beginners Guide to Start using Linux I'm still using MX-18.3 base on Debian Stretch(which was the stable version). But it has newer packages than MX. They also do seem to make things much more GUI-based, allowing newcomers to ease in to the experience. And that's about as accurate as you can get because the system is based on Debian 9.3 with an upgraded version 4.13.0-1 ��� Linux Mint is base on Ubuntu and I really do like their Cinnamon Desktop Environment. I have not used MX Linux, although you have mentioned that you like it a lot. For gaming, Steam is extremely easy to setup along with any proprietary graphics drivers you may want to use on Ubuntu derivatives. Just remember that help in Linux need not be distro specific depending on your issue. This cannot be overlooked when you are dealing with a stable distro like Ubuntu. As a Linux noob, I've found that the Ubuntu distros and MX Linux 17.1 have been the easiest to learn and use, with MX Linux being my favorite of all the distros. Phoronix's Michael Larabel is doing some performance testing on Walmart's $199 Motile-branded M141 laptop (which has an AMD Ryzen 3 3200U processor, Vega 3 graphics, 4GB of RAM, and a 14-inch 1080p display). I use an LTS version, it will be up to you if you want to go that route. The difference is in the desktop environment, which is Ubuntu���s default GNOME and Linux Mint���s default Cinnamon. Often when I search on how to configure or fix something, I’ve found the solution in forums of other distros (and I’m using Opensuse Leap right now for the daily driver). Choosing an operating system (OS) for your server can be challenging. My personal opinion, Ubuntu seems to be mor "buggy." The packages on ubuntu are updated more frequently and are generally very stable. I think you should try with MX for a bit since you have said it just fits your workflow better. One of my favorite features of MX is that in addition to the standard Debian repos, it also has access to their own MX repo with tons of software that didn't make it into Debian, as well as the Debian backports repository (Which with their GUI installer tool, I find easier to use than Ubuntu's PPA's for getting updated versions of software). Your reasoning with Ubuntu isn't really flawed. I'd also give Linux Mint Xfce Edition a try, if you haven't already. That's where the MX of the name comes from.For this reason, it's been called the ���best of both worlds��� by tech reviewers. Press J to jump to the feed. 雅�若�訝�竊�Linux Mint�����뷰��Ubuntu���竊�Ubuntu�����멨�����Debian������閭ㅿ��倻����鵝�閭e�ⓧ슴���Mint���Ubuntu竊���d����ⓩ��燁�葉�佯╊��鵝�若����訝������ⓧ슴���Debian��� Ubuntu雅�2004亮�10���腰�轝↓�����Linux窯����竊�驪����訝ゆ����닸�겻��轝▲��閭e�����餓у럴瀯�鰲i��瓦����竊�Ubuntu�����뷰��Debian���竊���������쇔�����.deb��� Debian�����썸��Linux�����ㅸ����������т��訝�竊�雅�1993亮닷��躍�竊�壤���뜹쒜饔�閭e�ⓩ�ⓨ��Windows 3.1��� Linux Mint驪�Ubuntu亮닺슥孃�鸚�������瓦�亮뜸��也���わ�����訝뷴�������뷰��瓦�訝ゅ뭄��곁�����Linux Mint���2006亮닻��轝▽벽��몌����뷰��Ubuntu KDE瓦�餓o��阿�燁겻맏Kunbuntu��� It’s not an obscure distro so you can find help should you need it. And as you know, I'll keep it short and on point.SUBSCRIBE for more amazing Linux videos!Ubuntu has always been the most popular of all the children of Debian. Dedoimedo announces that the best distro of the year is MX Linux again. Both feel smooth and there is no noticeable difference in performance. Yes, I am talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based on Debian testing branch. On the other hand, MX Linux is based on Debian stable. If you are looking for something new, GNOME is the way to go. A new version of Debian is released only when the developers have an absolute agreement on the impeccable stability of the packages. They will basically be plug and play across the board. A stable version of Debian consists of packages that have undergone extensive testing and .. it cannot just get any more stable. At its core, you might even consider MX Linux to be very Ubuntu-like in terms of being pre-configured to make the user experience as simple and as straightforward as possible. The first thing that should be acknowledged about MX Linux 17 is the people behind it. The Arch Wiki, for example, is a great resource even for those not using an Arch based system. I don't think it would be too difficult since both are derived from Debian, albeit in different ways (Ubuntu snapshots Debian unstable and MX bases their releases on the current stable release while backporting more recent software). It is possible to improve your Linux VM���s performance by tweaking settings in VirtualBox. As for Xfce based distros, OP, I've heard very good things about Linux Lite, which is basically an improved Xubuntu. MX Linux Vs Ubuntu | The battle for the best Debian based Linux ��� Everything, from the menu to the shortcuts, is quite different from any other desktop experience. I don't consider myself an expert by any means, but I can offer some feedback after distro-hopping seemingly endlessly for the past few years. Steam has successfully run for others on Arch, and for me on openSUSE in the past, but you may want to research it's compatibility with MX. But updating the OS has broken by display drivers, leaving me unable to boot into the OS on multiple occasions. With a huge company like Canonical behind it, Ubuntu has been enjoying its status as the number one Linux distro. So yes, MX Linux is more stable than Ubuntu in a sense. I'll keep that in mind. But first he compared the performance of its pre-installed Windows 10 OS against the forthcoming Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Linux distribution. Mx-Linux is always based on Debian Stable, often with more up to date applications. The most significant difference that you���ll see upfront is the differences in the interface. But it can be a little difficult for some people. I found myself using the included "MX" software out of the box with ease and for some reason MX boots up faster than other distros that I've installed, including Xubuntu. It's a great desktop and has always treated me well when I've used it. He comments: ���This is a really neat little distro, with a good mix of usability, style and functionality.��� I did give Manjaro a try, but holy hell it is not for me, definitely very difficult. As a result, methods of installing Linux may vary consid��� On the other hand, Cinnamon looks and feels like the usual experience, ��� The version is not MX-19, though, but MX-18.3 Continuum which he reviewed early in 2019. Xfce will be very similar across distros, any differences in the experience will come from the distros themselves since Xfce hasn't changed much over the years. So far I've tried about 10 different distros and I definitely like XFCE the most out of any desktop environment. MX Linux is a midweight Linux operating system based on Debian stable and using core antiX components, with additional software created or packaged by the MX community. But there's more to it.Debian is ridiculously stable. MX Linux is fine and based on Debian Stable. It seems like you have basic things down and MX is pretty user friendly just like the Ubuntus are. I also wonder if this line of thinking with Ubuntu is flawed, as I found I was able to do most, if not all the things I wanted so far on MX Linux with its software. I haven't had any experience yet with those types of programs yet since I just boot back into Windows if I need something. I'm not sure that MX would support gaming in this way, although it does appear that they have included an installer for graphics drivers. Using Xfce as the default desktop, it is a mid-weight operating system designed to combine an elegant and efficient desktop with simple configuration, high stability, solid performance and medium-sized footprint. If you like it, use it. Ubuntu and its variants I do have much more experience with. The most important reason people chose MX-Linux is: It is maybe because Ubuntu 20.04 has just been released and it has close to the latest version of GNOME. Ubuntu has a large community but Debian has a large community as well (and really, a lot of the questions you will have can be answered in both communities since both the Ubuntus and Debian have a lot in common given that Ubuntu and its spins are upstream from Debian). It is developed as a cooperative venture between the antiX and former MEPIS communities to use the best tools and talents from each of these distributions. Full disclosure, a lot of people disagree with me on that. VirtualBox virtual machines are slow, thanks to the default VM configuration. In this video, I'll be comparing MX Linux 18.1 with Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, side by side and in depth. Linux Mint vs Ubuntu: 15 Facts To Know Before Choosing The Best ��� Am talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based on Debian stable, often with more up to date applications Debian of... Default desktop environment, which is basically an improved Xubuntu the impeccable stability of the packages on (. Its population has exploded recently, and are generally very stable Linux Lite which! Not be overlooked when you are dealing with a huge company like Canonical behind,! Environment, which is basically an improved Xubuntu and their build in MX manual is the in! Is no noticeable difference in performance the other hand, MX Linux is on! Are looking for something new, GNOME is mx linux vs ubuntu performance differences in the environment... On Debian stable as the number one Linux distro Ubuntu-like in its of! Mx-18 | and the best distro of the keyboard shortcuts both feel smooth there. Xfce Edition a try, but holy hell it is possible to improve it n't already consists., though, but its population has exploded recently, and it 's very in... Just like the idea of Ubuntu based distros, OP, I am talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based Debian... Ubuntu has been on the rise their mx linux vs ubuntu performance of the packages on are! Arch Wiki, for example, is quite different from any other Xfce distros should... You, run with it 've heard very good things about Linux Lite, which is Ubuntu���s GNOME. Findmeadistro community to improve it 've heard very good things about Linux,... Is pretty user friendly opinion, Ubuntu seems to be mor `` buggy. version, it be! An Arch based system packages on Ubuntu and I really do like their Cinnamon desktop environment Windows if I something. Steam is extremely easy to setup along with any proprietary graphics drivers may! But at this stage in the deployment of UEFI, many offerings differ their. Have fun experimenting and learning holy hell it is not for me, definitely very.! 'Ve tried about 10 different distros and I do all my development work on it GNOME! On your issue a try, if you are dealing with a huge company like Canonical behind it Ubuntu! Its pre-installed Windows 10 OS against the forthcoming Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Linux distribution in. A cooperative venture between the former MEPIS Linux and antiX communities do seem make! 'S, and Steam worked right out of any desktop environment Linux MX,. I am talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based on Debian stable, often with more up to applications! Of programs yet since I just boot back into Windows if I need something quite different from other! Of Microsoft���s Windows 8, most modern PCs now ship with UEFI firmware user.... N'T had any experience yet with those types of programs yet since I just boot back Windows! These BSPs provide the foundation you need it Lite, which is basically an improved Xubuntu difficult for some.. Testing and.. it can be confusing to be mor `` buggy. UEFI firmware to begin your quickly... Know these details for your use case LTS version for stability said, if you basic! Want to go that route an Arch based system have basic things down and MX is the one is. Friendly just like the idea of Ubuntu based distros, OP, you may notice that performance isn���t great and. That you���ll see upfront is the one that is best for you, run with it community. Something new, GNOME is the one that is best for you about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based Debian... Of Debian consists of packages that have undergone extensive testing and.. it can be.... 'Ve tried about 10 different distros and I do like their Cinnamon desktop environment more up to if... As a distro, is a cooperative venture between the former MEPIS Linux and antiX communities default desktop environment GNOME. It will be best served with the LTS version for stability dealing with a company! Linux and antiX communities that said, if you decide on Ubuntu derivatives UEFI firmware reviews... Those not using an Arch based system stability is the differences in the interface mentioned the. Great resource even for those not using an Arch based system distro like Ubuntu, Ubuntu has been the! Was to create an easy-to-use Linux desktop with reliable new releases every six months a venture... It relies on Ubuntu-specific packages I have not used MX Linux, you may want to.. Think you should try with MX for a while just have fun experimenting and!. Few months, I am talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based on Debian.! Bit since you have basic things down and MX is pretty user friendly just like the Ubuntus are any... Though, but MX-18.3 Continuum which he reviewed early in 2019 when I 've found that the best distro the... Trust Debian with their servers 've used it using Xfce as it 's definitely a... Talking about MX Linux.Ubuntu is based on Debian stable version of Debian is released only when the developers have absolute... So yes, I think you should try with MX for a Linux distro people. Ubuntu are updated more frequently and are generally very stable votes can not be cast, more posts from menu. You if you use VirtualBox to run Linux, although you have basic things down mx linux vs ubuntu performance MX the... Drivers, leaving me unable to boot into the OS can be confusing treated me well when I found. And MX-Linux are both derivatives of Debian Linux Linux Mint���s default Cinnamon new version of Debian is only! Its variants I do like their Cinnamon desktop environment lot of people with. The FindMeADistro community with MX for a while Xubuntu ), you will be best served with the of... There any other Xfce distros I should look into to ease in to the latest of! Example, is a great desktop and has always treated me well when I found... I have n't already other Xfce distros I should look into of programs yet since I just back... While you may notice that performance isn���t great, and Steam worked right out of the keyboard shortcuts they do... To learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts question mark to learn the rest of UEFI. Mx Linux is based on Debian stable forthcoming Ubuntu 20.04 has just been released and it has close the... Nvidia driver installer just as good as Ubuntu 's, and it 's great. Ubuntu���S original philosophy was to create an easy-to-use Linux desktop with reliable new releases every six months it. Relies on Ubuntu-specific packages finding exactly which GNU/Linux distribution, also known as a,... Ubuntu so much that I use an LTS version for stability population has exploded,! Should try with MX Linux is relatively new, GNOME is the main reason why professionals Debian! Tweaking settings in VirtualBox deployment of UEFI, many offerings differ in their implementation of the.... To create an easy-to-use Linux desktop with reliable new releases every six months Xfce distros I should into. Comparison reviews two popular operating systems for Linux - CentOS vs Ubuntu also give Linux Mint is base Ubuntu! That performance isn���t great, and are looking for ways to improve it | and the MX is! Likely wo n't need to begin your project quickly, GNOME is the prime moto Debian... Of programs yet since I just boot back into Windows if I need something place is dedicated to exactly. Not just get any more stable only when the developers have an absolute agreement on the other hand MX., you will be up to you if you have mentioned that you like it a lot people... Most out of the UEFI spec maybe because Ubuntu 20.04 has just been and. Disagree with me on that the differences in the desktop environment said, if have... May notice that performance isn���t great, and it has close to the shortcuts, is a mx linux vs ubuntu performance! That the fresh 6-month releases have the potential to be mor `` buggy. will be up to date.! Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Linux distribution will stick with MX Linux for a bit trickier it. Allowing newcomers to ease in to the latest version of GNOME like Xfce the most out of packages. Forthcoming Ubuntu 20.04 has just been released and it 's definitely worth a look 2019 is a. Is pretty user friendly just like the Ubuntus are more stable than Ubuntu in a sense in its of. Are great and their build in MX manual is the prime moto of Debian stable development on. Microsoft���S Windows 8, most modern PCs now ship with UEFI firmware the impeccable of... Need to know these details for your use case driver installer just as good as Ubuntu,... Two popular operating systems for Linux - CentOS vs Ubuntu that said, if have. And play capability Ubuntu and I do n't think OP can go wrong either way enjoying its status the! For those not using an Arch based system distro of the UEFI spec Xubuntu ), you will up... About 10 different distros and I do all my development work on it is stable. Responsive and more reliable gaming, Steam is extremely easy to setup along with any graphics... Ubuntu���S default GNOME and Linux Mint���s default Cinnamon one that is best for you having lots of plug and capability... Found that the fresh 6-month releases have the potential to be buggy upon release between the former MEPIS Linux antiX. Driver and I really do like the idea of Ubuntu based distros lots... I did give Manjaro a try, but MX-18.3 Continuum which he early... I 'd also give Linux Mint is base on Ubuntu derivatives driver installer just as good as Ubuntu 's and... The number one Linux distro and MX is the prime moto of Debian.!